Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00158
Original file (BC 2014 00158.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-00158

	 		COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Presidential 
Unit Citation (PUC).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The Presidential Unit Citation he earned, while assigned to the 
XXX Field Maintenance Squadron, was not added to his record upon 
discharge. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a former member of the Air Force who served from 
1 October 1965 through 28 April 1969. 

According to the AFP 900-2, Unit Decorations, Awards and Campaign 
Participation, personnel assigned to the XXX Field Maintenance 
Squadron from 1 January 1966 through 10 October 1966; 11-12 August 
1967 and 24 – 27 October 1967 were awarded the Presidential Unit 
Citation.  

The applicant’s Airman’s Record reflects he was assigned to the 
XXX Field Maintenance Squadron beginning 1 May 1968 until his 
discharge on 28 April 1969. 

Upon review of his records, AFPC/DPSID verified the applicant’s 
entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal with four Bronze Service 
Stars and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm.  His 
records will be updated accordingly upon final Board action.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial.  The PUC is awarded to units of the 
Armed Forces of the United States and of cobelligerent nations, 
for extraordinary heroism in action against an armed enemy on or 
after 7 December 1941, for United States Army units.  After a 
thorough review of the applicant’s records, there was no official 
documentation verifying the applicant served with a unit that 
received the Presidential Unit Citation while he was assigned to 
the unit.

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 15 September 2014 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the requested relief beyond that 
rendered administratively.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2014-00158 in Executive Session on 4 December 2014, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:



The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBMCR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00158 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 Jan 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit A1.  DD Form 149 atchs, dated 15 Feb 14.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Record Excerpts.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 25 Mar 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Sep 14.






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03685

    Original file (BC-2012-03685.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the applicant served with the 45th Fighter Day Squadron, United States Air Force Europe, from 13 February 1956 to 19 September 1956. They were unable to verify award of any certificates or merits for the applicant’s service with the 45th Day Fighter Squadron, United States Air Force Europe or for his service while assigned to Travis Air Force Base. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02428

    Original file (BC-2012-02428.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02428 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of Presidential Unit citation with one Oak Leaf Cluster (PUC w/1 OLC)). The PUC is awarded to units of the United States Armed Forces for outstanding performance in action against an armed enemy, occurring...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00717

    Original file (BC 2013 00717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00717 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service record, are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02663

    Original file (BC-2011-02663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PUC was presented to his unit for participation in the missile crisis. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 02663

    Original file (BC 2011 02663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PUC was presented to his unit for participation in the missile crisis. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Sep 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02039

    Original file (BC 2013 02039.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02039 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be amended to reflect the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and any additional awards that he may be entitled to. DPSID was unable to verify the applicant served with a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02623

    Original file (BC 2014 02623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02623 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect the award of the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: a. Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P) (Administratively Corrected) c. Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) APPLICANT CONTENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02663

    Original file (BC-2012-02663.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PUC was presented to his unit for participation in the missile crisis. _______________________________________________________________ office Force of of the Air 2 THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05290

    Original file (BC 2013 05290.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05290 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 21 Aug 75 discharge, be corrected to add the awards below in Item 26, Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citation, and Campaign Ribbons...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00026

    Original file (BC-2013-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00026 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit...